On 3/29/11, Fernando Cassia <fcassia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andras Simon <szajmi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Or not. People who make decisions in IT departments on which OS to run >> on their servers are hopefully not basing those decisions on who's >> supplying the OS for their gadgets. > > Exactly, that must be why Novell never lost any market share and > Windows 9x didn´t conquer the minds of people at home first before NT > started making inroads in IT depts. Have you checked the financial health of Novell and Red Hat recently? I'm not sure Red Hat would like to be anywhere near where Novell is... As for MS, I think it's fair to say that it's playing in another league. Apart from everything else, they had enough money to bribe anyone into using their server OS. (Note to MS lawyers: I didn't say they did bribe someone...) If RH wants to follow their example, they should probably study what MS did in the 80's, not what they did in the 90's. Andras -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
