On 10/11/07, Karl Larsen <k5di@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Res wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Aly Dharshi wrote: > > > >>> ummmm when your responsible for what I am, yeah, because I'm paid to > >>> not have things fuck up, but since we > > >>> , you say it is your responsability, who else was involved with the > >>> moving all servers to Slackware, we've never had a single hiccup, so > >>> I aint had to any problems in years. > > >>> > >>> for fucks sake, RH cant even sort out their own rsync servers, why > >>> would I try trusting them again, its a complete joke, and the funny > >>> thing is, the same person resposible for it is probably still in > >>> that job > >> > >> Which is why you would run something like RHEL for production > > > > No.... Its exactly why I dont run it. I've used RHEL, RHES and more > > recently the RHEL clone CentOS, they are all still bloated to buggery, > > unnecessary crud = unnecessary risks, Once a Slackware server is > > installed it rarely needs to be touched, only if we want to put a new > > kernel in, or the once in a blue moon security update, which is rare > > because of the non-bloatness and non-butchering, slackware is > > essentially a install and forget, it gives us more time to do new > > projects. > > > > Please don't quote this idot, I've already blocked all emails from him, don't give him a gateway into my inbox. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
