Re: 2.6.23 kernel

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• From: Scott Henson <shenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:19:01 -0400
• In-reply-to: <470D0A77.7030008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <7ab3ad200710100830k18fd6b2cva9e445c792b45e5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710110141460.9588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <feitdm$kv3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <470D0A77.7030008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070926)

John Wendel wrote:
<snip>
> 
> Don't be a wimp!  Seriously, if you've got some spare time and a
> non-critical box, you should build 2.6.23, beat it up, and file bug
> reports. It's the way we non-kernel-developers can contribute.
> 

I have no problem with that, but as for a box I actually care about and
want to get stuff done on, vendor kernels all the way.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Res

• References:
  • 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Rohan Kulkarni
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Res
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Scott Henson
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: John Wendel

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread