On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 17:53, jdow wrote:
> Rahul, I suspect it would be a good idea if they visited this list from
> time to time to get a sense of the "buzz". That is what I do with the
> LKML list. (Which is what convinces me that 2.6 is a development kernel
> rather than a stable kernel, even number notwithstanding. 2.6.15 hardly
> resembles 2.6.12 in much of any regard. And 16's going to be farther
> afield. It seems like Linus has lost control. But that's another rant,
> or should be. {^_-}
You make it sound like that's a surprise - or a change. Serious
problems were still being fixed up though about X.X.20 of the
previous kernel "stable" releases.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
