On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 13:18 -0600, Robin Laing wrote: > es Mikesell wrote: > > Robin Laing wrote: > > > > >>> What I found was slowing the system down in regards to using > filters > >> was it took forever to scan the messages and process them. I am > not > >> the only person having these issues here. Even one of our IT > members > >> has the same issues. > > > > How's the speed if you use browser access to owa? > > That depends on the load on the server. > > If I don't run filters, even evolution is fast. I can copy (move > really > doesn't move) messages to my local mailbox, expunge the server inbox > in > ~2 minutes on 270 messages. > I would add to that to , if you don't run spam detection evolution is fast. However, I have this philosophy. Normally when I run evolution I also have some mail to send. While the mail is downloading I compose my new messages. By the time I am finished the old mail is usually downloaded. I like evolution and I like that it has built in junk filtering so waiting a few minutes is not a big deal. I run evolution when I first log on and you can perform other tasks while new mail is loading. From them on new mail is brought down every 5 minutes with out my noticing any lag time. -- ======================================================================= drug, n: A substance that, injected into a rat, produces a scientific paper. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
