Re: Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:22:44AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > For example if someone rebuilds a kernel with the same name/number outside
>  > of RPM.
>  > But, y'know, Don't Do That.
> If someone is building their own kernel, they should know what they're doing.
> Folks building their own kernels get to turn on /proc/config.gz for themselves
> anyway if they really want it. This discussion is about the packaging of
> the kernel RPMs used by those who don't recompile.

I'm thinking of a situation where there's more than one person involved,
which often happens in real world sysadmin catastrop^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H
experience. Someone who doesn't really know the rules rebuilds the kernel to
fix some "urgent problem", doesn't turn that on, doesn't make a new name (or
even goes out of their way to match the RPM packages name, for some reason
that seems like a good idea at the time).

The next person who comes along and looks at /boot/config-`uname -r` will be
confused, and it might take them a while to think to verify that the running
kernel is actually the RPM version.

Maybe this is far-fetched -- and probably "have good sysadmin policies" is a
better fix than the /proc option.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux