On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:06:19AM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > > Of course one does not _have_ to follow Torvalds, > > and one certainly does not have to say Yes to all kernel options. > > > > However, if you are going to save .config, I don't see any advantage > > in _not_ doing it as suggested by Torvalds (or his team). > > Name *one* good reason for doing /proc/config.gz over > Copying it to /boot/. I've seen this proposed multiple > times (on-list and in bugzilla), and not seen a single compelling > reason to turn it on. One good reason to do it is that you can be sure the config matches exactly what is currently running. -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
