On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:12:57AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > I guess the argument is: there's a chance that something got skipped > > and the a kernel got built with the name matching a /boot/config-* file > > but actually with different options -- no risk of that with the /proc > > approach. > There's no risk of it happening with the current approach either. > The .config that gets packaged is the .config rpmbuild faced > when it built the RPM. Why would it be different ? For example if someone rebuilds a kernel with the same name/number outside of RPM. But, y'know, Don't Do That. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
