Re: non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:13:17 -0700
Bruce Byfield <bbyfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you look into American law, you'll see that, as a publicly traded
> company, Red Hat is required to act in certain ways. 

Perhaps a long-term solution would be for Fedora servers to be managed by a
non-profit corporation that's incorporated in a country other than the US.

Where, what and exactly how is left as an exercise for the reader.  But there
was a call for suggestions and in the absence of real information about the
exact nature of the problem, a suggestion as vague as the above is about as
good as it's going to get.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux