Re: non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 13:41 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:27:47 -0800
> Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >  the full details
> > can not be publicly disclosed instantaneously due to legal constraint
> 
> This I simply don't understand.

Anybody who has had extensive dealings with lawyers knows that they tend
to err on the side of caution at any time. When a publicly traded
company is involved, that's even more true.

Whether Red Hat and Fedora could have acted differently is a debatable
point. But that Red Hat acted as it did is not surprising. Just because
a corporation is open source, it doesn't stop being a corporation.

-- 
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177
Burnaby, BC, Canada
web: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
blog: http://brucebyfield.wordpress.com/


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux