2008/4/20 David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx>: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 20:23 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > > > > I don't know if it's actually *possible* to install Fedora without > > Gnome, but I take your point. > > > > > You can install Fedora and chose to not install the GNOME desktop. Since > GNOME is the default you have to actively chose *not* to install it. You > have to uncheck the box. > > > > > > Fair enough. My original post was in answer to a question about whether > > KDE was a "second-class citizen" in Fedora, which is why I didn't > > mention other desktops, but of course the same comments apply to them as > > well. > > > > > Fedora has a very active team that works on KDE. Calling KDE "a > "second-class citizen" in Fedora" would hurt their feeling I would think. > ;-) > I wasn't trying to hurt anyone's feelings. Hopefully they've got thicker skin than that, I made an observation based on my experience. I felt then and now that the default KDE desktop looked and felt like a GNOME knock-off. It has also been my experience that most do assume that you have GNOME installed. I'll happily try KDE again when F9 hits final release, I hope to be proven wrong, I don't expect it will all work flawlessly, it is as many have said a major revision, but KDE needs its own personality, I didn't feel that KDE distinguished itself from GNOME very well when i first tried it on Fedora 7. If i'm in the minority with that opinion, so be it. I appreciate all the hard work that goes into Fedora, hopefully nobody takes my comments to personally. No one is obliged to prove anything to anyone. I still think Fedora blows the doors off all the other Linux distributions, I've tried most of them. Max -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list