Re: 2.6.23 kernel

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
• References: <7ab3ad200710100830k18fd6b2cva9e445c792b45e5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710110141460.9588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <feitdm$kv3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <470D0A77.7030008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fej567$g60$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710110917490.9588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <felag4$13i$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710120734330.31657@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Res <res <at> ausics.net> writes:
> components, which he still supports versions of back to 2001, which is 
> longer than RHEL.

Not true, RHEL is supported for 7 years.

        Kevin Kofler

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Res

• References:
  • 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Rohan Kulkarni
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Res
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Scott Henson
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: John Wendel
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Scott Henson
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Res
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Scott Henson
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    • From: Res

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread