On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:46:18 -0400, Gene Heskett scripst: > I call bs on that! For all the other fawncy file managers they've tried > to paint a decent face on over the last 5 years, not one of them can > even begin to compare with mc. Sure, the current Krusader is pretty, > but it can't do 90% of what mc can. When it can, then talk about > dropping mc, and not a millisecond before. I would personally strongly against removing mc ever (krusader, gnome- commander etc. suck when used through ssh), but I would be very much interested in knowing what 90% (repeat 90%!!!) of mc functionality is not covered by krusader. Would you englighten me, please? Matěj
