On Wednesday 04 July 2007, Matej Cepl wrote: >On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:46:18 -0400, Gene Heskett scripst: >> I call bs on that! For all the other fawncy file managers they've tried >> to paint a decent face on over the last 5 years, not one of them can >> even begin to compare with mc. Sure, the current Krusader is pretty, >> but it can't do 90% of what mc can. When it can, then talk about >> dropping mc, and not a millisecond before. > >I would personally strongly against removing mc ever (krusader, gnome- >commander etc. suck when used through ssh), but I would be very much >interested in knowing what 90% (repeat 90%!!!) of mc functionality is not >covered by krusader. Would you englighten me, please? > >Matěj For starters, it *(Krusader) doesn't unpack or install/update package files, in my case rpms. It doesn't view a graphic file nearly as fast or well. There were a lot of things that mc does just by hitting the enter key, but Krusader seems to just ignore. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Welcome to Lake Wobegon, where all the men are strong, the women are pretty, and the children are above-average. -- Garrison Keillor
