On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 16:32, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Your argument would be more convincing if you could point out > > some directions that FC has taken that are more in the > > community interest than in building the next RHEL. Can you? > > Define "community interest" I'd start with making a new user's first time experience as painless as possible. > This is NOT a monolithic community with a single set of opinions and > a single non-overlap set of desires. Can we have a show of hands from the people who think a new user should have to download an iso image full of bugs that have been fixed for most of a year that may prevent the install from working and that will require a gig or so of additional downloading to fix if the install succeeds? > Would you also count the work going on with Kadischi as being an RHEL > inspired subproject? > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kadischi > I wouldn't. It looks like a badly-need catch up to all the other popular distributions to me. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
