On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 01:21, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> Very unlikely. RHEL is too boring for a community to participate. It is
> almost stagnant which is great for enterprises but not for the
> community. If RHEL would have been suitable for everyone Red Hat wouldnt
> started Fedora or vice versa.
Your argument would be more convincing if you could point out
some directions that FC has taken that are more in the
community interest than in building the next RHEL. Can you?
RHEL4 looks very much like a direct cutover from what was
built in FC3 with Mysql4.x dropped in, and so far everything
in subsequent FC releases looks like more of the same. If
this is really supposed to be a community project, shouldn't
it take some directions that aren't aimed at building the
next RHEL version?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
