On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:27:34AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > >Well I guess all this is a matter of opinion. To me the response to a > >complaint of "that is how we always did it" is puerile. You seem to be > >the redhat representative in this discussion it seems to me you could > >spend some of your time communicating to the "powers" about our > >feelings than just defending the decision blindly. > > It doesn't seem to me that this is what Rahul is doing. He's pointing > out that this is not the right forum. His claim (IIUI) is that the > people who need to see these messages for the most part don't take > time to read this forum. He's suggested a place to post where they > do read, so... > > >After all your explanations I can't understand why it would hurt > >anything or anyone to delay the movement of FC3 to legacy until after > >FC5 release. People in the "community" are saying that this decision > >makes it more difficult for them. > > > >This follows multiple decisions the RedHat has made that the list > >members have felt was wrong and not once have I detected a willingness > >on Red Hat's part to reconsider the decision. > > Did you put any of your concerns where Rahul said they would have > effect? > Ok, I can take a hint. -- ======================================================================= Individualists unite! ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University telephone: (210)-999-7484
