On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 09:26 -0600, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:07:46PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > > >We're simply trying to assert some community influence, Rahul. > > > > Like I said, post to fedora-devel for development discussions. I am not > > sure how anything that does not even more additional burden to the > > development team would be good but maybe with good rationale it will be > > considered. > > > > -- > > Rahul > > > Well I guess all this is a matter of opinion. To me the response to a > complaint of "that is how we always did it" is puerile. You seem to be > the redhat representative in this discussion it seems to me you could > spend some of your time communicating to the "powers" about our > feelings than just defending the decision blindly. > > After all your explanations I can't understand why it would hurt > anything or anyone to delay the movement of FC3 to legacy until after > FC5 release. People in the "community" are saying that this decision > makes it more difficult for them. > > This follows multiple decisions the RedHat has made that the list > members have felt was wrong and not once have I detected a willingness > on Red Hat's part to reconsider the decision. ---- He is but one person. The decisions are made by those who are on the fedora-development list. Rahul has stated as much above. Please take your comments to that list where it will reach those who make the decision rather than pissing in the wind here. Craig
