Re: Why do I need isdn4k-utils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:02:03PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 > Hi
 > > 
 > > On the other hand, I still see no valid arguments for putting isdn4k-
 > > utils on *every* Fedora system on Earth. Certainly ISDN is not *that*
 > > important, nor is it *that* widespread.
 > 
 > if you believe in that file a bug  at bugzilla.redhat.com then

I've been thinking about this off and on for the last week
about a number of services. Just because we install them doesn't
necessarily mean they need be enabled at every boot.

Take for example microcode_ctl (formerly part of kernel-utils).
This is only a relevant tool if you have an Intel CPU of 686
class or higher. You can however install the package on anything,
and until last week's rawhide, it would chkconfig --add itself
unconditionally, resulting in the startup of this tool that would
immediately exit. Every single time you boot.

I've got plans to add similar smarts to other tools, such
as 'only enable pcmcia service if a pcmcia/cardbus controller
is listed in lspci'.  The only question bugging me right now is
'what happens if someone adds a PCI PCMCIA controller card
at a later date'. Kudzu will spot the card, but will it
do the necessary magic with chkconfig? Bill ?

Hopefully by the time we get to FC4, with enough changes
like this, the boot process of a 'default' install should
be a lot faster than we have today. (along with all the
other work thats ongoing to speed it up).

		Dave


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux