On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 17:55 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote: > This isn't the right trade-off for everyone. But it will make Free > Software more accessible to a large proportion of people, and make it a > more financially attractive proposition for the corporate desktop. > On a percentage basis, the number of people using ISDN lines is very small. Your argument is quite sound and well-reasoned, and I find a lot of value in it. However, note that it is far more applicable to the kernel modules than for isdn4k-utils, which is the subject directly at hand here. There's also the issue of which package group holds isdn4k-utils (again, in this specific example). If it's in the desktop set of packages, then your argument holds more water (although I still don't buy it... see my response to Matt just a minute or two ago). But in the minimal package set, I believe that isdn4k-utils is *definitely* not needed. Cheers, -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
