Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)

On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 06:24:29PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
> Is there anything else you want me to try: I can probably wave a
> chicken over the machine or get some black candles or something?

Stop using icecream or anything that might to any kind of binary object
caching or header analysis to minimize compiles during the build. Make sure
you're really cleaning the entire kernel directory before each build. Make
sure it'a full build for starters.

Throw a #error in the __put_task_struct_inline(), not the alternative
__put_task_struct(). It should bark at compile time and fail to compile
kernel/fork.c

The function __put_task_struct() should never show up a stack trace
EVER. That function has been rename under all things CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
under my addendum patches. That's why I'm starting to think it's your
build environment or you're miss applying the patches.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Next by Date: Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's?
• Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]