On 8/22/06, hui Bill Huey <[email protected]> wrote:
I turned off the tracing in the latency tracking stuff and a relatively
small patch is here against -rt8:
http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/against-2.6.17-rt8-0.diff
I'm going to assume that the #error here: +#ifdef CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE +#error + stop_trace(); +#endif is to see if I'm awake. No, but gcc is. I just removed it (?). End result is as with the previous patch: nothing to serial console, and just the single line moaning about line 471 in blah blah blah. -- Robert Crocombe [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] BC: user interface (syscalls)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] VFS: FS CoW using redirection
- Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Index(es):
 |