Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)

On 8/22/06, hui Bill Huey <[email protected]> wrote:

I turned off the tracing in the latency tracking stuff and a relatively
small patch is here against -rt8:

        http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/against-2.6.17-rt8-0.diff

I'm going to assume that the #error here:

+#ifdef CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE
+#error
+       stop_trace();
+#endif

is to see if I'm awake.  No, but gcc is.  I just removed it (?).

End result is as with the previous patch: nothing to serial console,
and just the single line moaning about line 471 in blah blah blah.

--
Robert Crocombe
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] BC: user interface (syscalls)
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] VFS: FS CoW using redirection
• Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]