Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:37:22PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> I'll come up with a patch tomorrow to try and get a clean stack trace. I've
> made some change to the bug dump output to make it more preemption aware,
> but, as you can, some tweeking is needed.

I turned off the tracing in the latency tracking stuff and a relatively
small patch is here against -rt8:

	http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/against-2.6.17-rt8-0.diff

This might help with the stack trace. The stack trace being kind of clobbered is a
different issue entirely. I don't know since I can't replicate your problem over here.
I'm going to start looking over the rt mutex more carefully and see what case might
make this assert trigger. I'll try and deal with this one and a time.

I'm new at this bug fixing thing so give me a bit of time. Apparently Ingo's on
long vacation.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
  - From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
  - From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
  - From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH RESEND] mtrr: Add lock annotations for prepare_set and post_set
Next by Date: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
Previous by thread: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]