On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:14:27AM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote: ... > > End result is as with the previous patch: nothing to serial console, > > and just the single line moaning about line 471 in blah blah blah. ... > It might be the case that I need to remove some of that stuff and then > reupload the patch. I'm kind of guessing at the problem right now with > your stack dumps and it looks like the changes are causing more problems > than it is helping. Let me change that and upload something else to you > today. http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/against-2.6.17-rt8-1.diff I turned off the __WARN_ON() change. I should test that more thoroughly. I also cleaned up things a bit. I'm on irc.oftc.net as "bh" if you want somebody that's interactive. It might help with things here. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] SELinux: 3/3 convert sbsec semaphore to a mutex
- Next by Date: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Index(es):
 |