Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:22:03PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote:
...
> > I'll post the config, too, just so there's a clear understanding of
> > where we are.
> 
> Ok, yeah, I've been trying to get a clean stack trace output and not
> really focused on the core issue. The debug output stuff seemed to need
> some attention because of the hanging and continuous output of stack
> traces. It makes it difficult to figure out what's going on when there
> are a cascade of failures going on.
> 
> I'll upload those small changes next and try to figure out what's going
> on with kjournald and the rtmutex. This is going to be a pain.

I still can't replicate the problem here with my made up test suite, so
I'm going to take a guess and shove some memory barriers in the rt mutex
code. That code looked a bit suspect.

	http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/against-2.6.17-rt8-2.diff

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
    • From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [take13 1/3] kevent: Core files.
• Next by Date: Re: Unnecessary Relocation Hiding?
• Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]