On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:22:03PM -0700, Robert Crocombe wrote: ... > > I'll post the config, too, just so there's a clear understanding of > > where we are. > > Ok, yeah, I've been trying to get a clean stack trace output and not > really focused on the core issue. The debug output stuff seemed to need > some attention because of the hanging and continuous output of stack > traces. It makes it difficult to figure out what's going on when there > are a cascade of failures going on. > > I'll upload those small changes next and try to figure out what's going > on with kjournald and the rtmutex. This is going to be a pain. I still can't replicate the problem here with my made up test suite, so I'm going to take a guess and shove some memory barriers in the rt mutex code. That code looked a bit suspect. http://mmlinux.sourceforge.net/public/against-2.6.17-rt8-2.diff bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: [take13 1/3] kevent: Core files.
- Next by Date: Re: Unnecessary Relocation Hiding?
- Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Index(es):