On 8/25/06, Robert Crocombe <[email protected]> wrote:
Of 4 total attempts this way, two completed with no problems, one had
Drat, this isn't quite true. There was one attempt with 'make', and that produced the 1st BUG, but the latter three attempts were with 'make -j40': two were okay, and one produced the two BUGs. Apologies. I will make additional attempts with 'make' only. -- Robert Crocombe [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- References:
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch] restore the RCU callback to defer put_task_struct() Re: Problems with 2.6.17-rt8
- Prev by Date: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm2] fs/ntfs: Conversion to generic boolean
- Previous by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Next by thread: Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)
- Index(es):
 |