Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

[Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>]

On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:54 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was
> working
> > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup
> > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I
> > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail
> > somehow...
> 
> Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). 

You do know that message is harmless and doesn't actually do anything
right?  It's just warning you that the kernel allowed something to hog
the CPU without rescheduling for a LONG time.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/