On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 17:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Certainly not.
>
> The problem is the soft lockup watchdog tends to produce
> false-positives
> related to the clock resume vs timer interrupt dependencies that are
> hard to trace.
>
> I used to get those on a regular basis until the timer resume on
> x86-64
> got fixed a month ago or so.
So it's uncovering bugs, exactly as intended.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
