Hi. On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:24:18AM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:15 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > Isn't this what happend with swusp? I tried it of a period of time > > when it was included in mainline, it was just buggy and nothing much > > improved. > > And you never explained why you can't try a recent version... I said I surely will :-) However, there wasn't a recent version until a short time before. I just did what you do in situations where you need a working solution: you stick to the most promising thing. While swsusp looked abandoned there was a huge work going on with Suspend 2. As work started again on swsusp recently I will try that, but from what I have read so far it looks like swsusp is scheduled to become deprecated anyway and work will be put into uswsusp. That is all I complain about, it means throwing away everything that is working, or easy to get it working, and delaying working hibernate support for another time. Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel CSA Gigabit Bug in IC7-G Motherboards- Affects Windows/Linux
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture --improved version
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):