On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > > Pavel Machek wrote: > > .. > > >...so yes, it works... > > > > About 50% of the time for me. The rest of the time I just > > see a complete fresh boot from scratch. What a pain! > > Ouch... strange. Does it work reliably from init=/bin/bash boot? Do > you see final steps of writing on the screen? Can you submit it to > bugzilla.kernel.org? > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail somehow... For the record - I never tried swsuspend2 as I am tracking the tip of Linus's tree and prefre to have the tree clean for my work anyway. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <matthias@wspse.de>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: 2.6.16-rc4-mm1: usbfs2 multiply defined symbols
- Next by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
![]() |