> On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > .. > > > >...so yes, it works... > > > > > > About 50% of the time for me. The rest of the time I just > > > see a complete fresh boot from scratch. What a pain! > > > > Ouch... strange. Does it work reliably from init=/bin/bash boot? Do > > you see final steps of writing on the screen? Can you submit it to > > bugzilla.kernel.org? > > > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail > somehow... Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] VPIDs: pid/vpid conversions
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
 |