Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

["Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On 2/20/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:54 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was
> > working
> > > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup
> > > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I
> > > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail
> > > somehow...
> >
> > Disable soft lockup watchdog :-).
>
> You do know that message is harmless and doesn't actually do anything
> right?  It's just warning you that the kernel allowed something to hog
> the CPU without rescheduling for a LONG time.

Well, if that is harmless I am not sure what you'd call harmful ;) 
because right after this message the box hangs solid and I have to
push and hold power button to power it off and start again.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/