Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

>[...]
>> Indeed. I'm not sure if any distros actually *do* release every three
>
>Gentoo would probably qualify for that.

>Debian, FC, SusE not.

"Advanced users" can pick a SUSE KOTD.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Matthew Frost <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Sven-Haegar Koch <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Michael Loftis <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Nix <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Nix <[email protected]>
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
  - From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/6] vfs: extend loopback (bind) mounts by mnt_flags
Next by Date: Re: pthread_mutex_unlock (was Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow)
Previous by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
Next by thread: Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]