On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 21:30 +0000, Nix wrote:
> Besides, the distinction between a 6 month cycle and a 3 month cycle
> isn't all that great, and we have a 3 month cycle *now*.
>
If you want to be a viable desktop OS which requires supporting the
latest hardware 6 months is too slow. Many vendors of desktop junk come
out with a new card every 3-6 months. Users don't want to wait a year
for their favorite distro to support their new hardware.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
- Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]