Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:39 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:19 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > man mount
> > 
> 
> async is the default for most filesystems but the NFS standard requires
> writes to be synchronous.

On the server side, note. Not the client side. Justin appears to be
looking at the client, whereas you are referring to an export option on
the server.

The client only guarantees that writes must have been committed to disk
on the server when either fsync() or close() have been called.

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [parisc-linux] [PATCH] Fix parisc build (flush_tlb_all_local)
Next by Date: Problems building
Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]