man mount On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:07 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:auto Can be mounted with the -a option. defaults Use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec, auto, nouser, and async. The default is async, no?The server side also needs to specify async in exports. You even get a warning if you do not specify sync or async, because the default had been changed once.What is the date on the above man page? Looks like the docs need to be updated. I believe the default was originally async, which violates the NFS spec and is dangerous, and changed to sync at some point. Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Prev by Date: Re: Huge pages and small pages. . .
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Index(es):