On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:07 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > auto Can be mounted with the -a option. > > > > defaults > > Use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec, auto, > > nouser, and async. > > > > The default is async, no? > > The server side also needs to specify async in exports. You even get a > warning if you do not specify sync or async, because the default had > been changed once. > What is the date on the above man page? Looks like the docs need to be updated. I believe the default was originally async, which violates the NFS spec and is dangerous, and changed to sync at some point. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Next by Date: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (configuration)
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Index(es):