Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:07 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > auto   Can be mounted with the -a option.
> >
> > defaults
> > Use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec,  auto,
> > nouser, and async.
> >
> > The default is async, no?
> 
> The server side also needs to specify async in exports. You even get a 
> warning if you do not specify sync or async, because the default had 
> been changed once.
> 

What is the date on the above man page?  Looks like the docs need to be
updated.

I believe the default was originally async, which violates the NFS spec
and is dangerous, and changed to sync at some point.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
• Next by Date: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (configuration)
• Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
• Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]