auto Can be mounted with the -a option.
defaults
Use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec, auto,
nouser, and async.
The default is async, no?
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Did you get my other e-mail? $ cp file /nfs/destination $ lftp> put fileYes, but how big a file is this? Is it significantly larger than the amount of cache memory on the server? As I said, if ftp is failing to sync the file to disk, then you may be comparing apples and oranges.Ok, so what happens if you use NFS with the async option, does it go a little faster? Jan Engelhardt --
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Prev by Date: 2.6.15 libata/sata_sil: not detecting my SATA dvd-drive.
- Next by Date: PATCH: Set latency when resetting it821x out of firmware mode
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Index(es):
 |