On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:19 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > man mount > async is the default for most filesystems but the NFS standard requires writes to be synchronous. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Prev by Date: Re: wireless: recap of current issues (other issues / fake ethernet)
- Next by Date: Re: FYI: RAID5 unusably unstable through 2.6.14
- Previous by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
- Index(es):
 |