Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
From: Phil Oester <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:23:19 -0800
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601161957300.16829@p34>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601161957300.16829@p34>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:07:02PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> I suppose I should try NFS with TCP, yes?

Precisely.

Phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>

References:
- Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
  - From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] networking ipv4: remove total socket usage count from /proc/net/sockstat
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Previous by thread: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Next by thread: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux