On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:31 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I don't see the need for higher precision in this API and a change is
> confusing. There is nanosleep() for people who only want a delay and
> that can be done with high precision.
If that's the case, might one enquire as to why pselect() has a struct
timespec instead of a struct timeval?
Or would the answer just depress me?
>
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]