Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

[Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>]

David Woodhouse wrote:

> Eep -- I hadn't noticed that difference. Will update patch accordingly. 

And change it to expect a 64bit value I hope...


> The other documented difference (other than the signal mask bit) is that
> pselect() is documented not to modify the timeout parameter. I'm not
> sure whether I should preserve that difference, or not.

As long as there is a configuration where the timeout value is not
modified, it doesn't matter.  That is the case for select() using a
personality switch.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature