On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:16 +0200, bert hubert wrote: > So, please, consider merging the patches.. ppoll is something else, I never > heard about it, but pselect is widely known. It just seemed silly to implement pselect() without doing ppoll() at the same time. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- References:
- Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: jnf <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- From: bert hubert <[email protected]>
- Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Prev by Date: [FIX] apm.c: ignore_normal_resume is set to 1 a bit too late
- Next by Date: [RFC] blkstat
- Previous by thread: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Next by thread: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Index(es):
 |