On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:38 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> And change it to expect a 64bit value I hope...
64-bit value for which? For seconds? Do we need to support timeouts of
longer than 4 milliard seconds? We can't currently come close to that
anyway -- we're limited to LONG_MAX / HZ seconds, and if the user asks
for more than that then it appears to be silently switched to an
infinite timeout.
> As long as there is a configuration where the timeout value is not
> modified, it doesn't matter. That is the case for select() using a
> personality switch.
I think it would be best to behave likewise for pselect().
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
- Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]