Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:38 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> And change it to expect a 64bit value I hope...

64-bit value for which? For seconds? Do we need to support timeouts of
longer than 4 milliard seconds? We can't currently come close to that
anyway -- we're limited to LONG_MAX / HZ seconds, and if the user asks
for more than that then it appears to be silently switched to an
infinite timeout.

> As long as there is a configuration where the timeout value is not
> modified, it doesn't matter.  That is the case for select() using a
> personality switch.

I think it would be best to behave likewise for pselect().

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux