Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Anyway, that's three different approaches, all of which are portable and 
> thus preferable to pselect() which is not.

pselect is portable, just not to current and old Linux systems.  It's in
POSIX for a while and the other Unixes have the interface.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: bert hubert <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: jnf <[email protected]>
  • Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] local_irq_disable removal
• Next by Date: Re: slow directory listing
• Previous by thread: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
• Next by thread: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]