On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:41:41AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:16 +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> > So, please, consider merging the patches.. ppoll is something else, I never
> > heard about it, but pselect is widely known.
>
> It just seemed silly to implement pselect() without doing ppoll() at the
> same time.
Yes, it kinda makes sense. Question to Uli: would you put ppoll() into
glibc as GNU extension? If not adding the syscall is rather poinless
unfortunately.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]