On 08/09/2010 11:59 AM, JD wrote: > On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to >>> figure out what is "broken". >> Ah hah.... >> >> I see the problem....but not sure how to fix yet..... >> >> In the Makefile you see..... at line 236 >> >> ifneq (,$(findstring 2.4,$(LINUX_SRC))) >> >> Well....the current kernel is 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686.PAE which >> contains the string 2.4 so the build thinks this is a 2.4 kernel build! >> >> My wife and cats are yelling at me...... >> >> >> > Hi Ed, and Mr. binary :) > > I did not keep the original build output from mr. binary ... > > Did the compilation error message look like this: > > ...... > /2010_0709_RT3572_Linux_STA_v2.4.0.1/os/linux/../../common/cmm_mac_usb.c:52: > error: implicit declaration of function ‘usb_buffer_alloc’ > > If so, then it has nothing to do with > ifneq (,$(findstring 2.4,$(LINUX_SRC))) > > at all. > > It has to do with the fact that usb_buffer_alloc function is no longer > present in the kernel sources of the linux version you are compiling for. > Nor is it present in my kernel source 2.6.35-git1 > > It was present in > > > kernel-2.6.32.16-150.fc12.src/linux-2.6.32/drivers/usb/core/usb.c > > and exported via header file > > kernel-2.6.32.16-150.fc12.src/linux-2.6.32/include/linux/usb.h > > This function was taken out sometime kernel 2.6.32.16-150 > > This is the problem with ralinktech. They do not keep up with > linux kernel changes. They think one hat fits all is the way to go. > Unlike, for example, VirtualBox - which has a separate release for > several kernel revisions of Fedora. > > Does that mean I have to scrap the compile ideal and wait for them to come out with a Linux driver ? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
