On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binarynut@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the > WUSB600N. > > That means it has a different chipset than Ver. 1 . FWIW, I don't have a WUSB600N. I also don't know, and didn't make the claim that the WUSB600N has a rt2860 chipset. My responses were solely directed towards indicating that if one did have a RaLink RT2860 I felt it better to use the rpmfusion packages as opposed to trying to compile the staging stuff. If you can believe what you read on the net, :-), the v1 is rt2860 based while the v2 is rt3572 based. http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Wireless-Adapters/Is-the-chipset-of-WUSB600N-v1-different-from-WUSB600N-v2/m-p/314181 is one source. -- Q: Why don't lawyers go to the beach? A: The cats keep trying to bury them. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
