2008/8/24 Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Disclosure doesn't sabotage forensic evidence. I can tell you that there is > blood on this shoe without having any effect at all on the blood that's on the > shoe. Actually there is a long history of police forces withholding vital details of a crime in order to, say, detect whether a person is: - a fraud, because they don't know some detail that the perpetrator of the crime alone would likely know - guilty, because they inadvertently reveal a detail that the perpetrator of the crime alone would likely know -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list