On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 19:57 +1000, Res wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Res wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Scott Henson wrote: > >> > >>> John Wendel wrote: > >>> <snip> > >>>> > >>>> Don't be a wimp! Seriously, if you've got some spare time and a > >>>> non-critical box, you should build 2.6.23, beat it up, and file > >>>> bug reports. It's the way we non-kernel-developers can > >>>> contribute. > >>> > >>> I have no problem with that, but as for a box I actually care > >>> about and want to get stuff done on, vendor kernels all the way. > >>> > >> > >> I recall, hrmmmmmm RH4 i think it was, maybe earlier, an automatic > >> update rendored my desktop useless, they corrected it within hours, > >> but thats too late for the poor suckers like me that were affected, > >> since then, a valuable lesson learnt was never trust a vendors > >> "update" verbatim, and since then, I've never used a RH kernel, once > >> bitten ok, twice bitten your a damned fool. > > > > ummmmmm ... over-dramatize much? > > > > > rday > > ummmm when your responsible for what I am, yeah, because I'm paid to not > have things fuck up, but since we moved all servers to Slackware, we've > never had a single hiccup, so I aint had to any problems in years. > for fucks sake, RH cant even sort out their own rsync servers, why would I > try trusting them again, its a complete joke, and the funny thing is, the > same person resposible for it is probably still in that job > ... Might I inquire why do you continue to soil this ML with your offensive language and anti-RH/Fedora posts? - Gilboa /* don't bother answering; I've already added your email address to my junk filter */
